Chris Went writes:
Concerns have been raised that part of the grazing land at Weaver’s Hill may again be under threat of development. The land, which is part of the green belt, abuts the lane to Oxenhope which, associated with Charlotte Brontë’s meetings with Arthur Bell Nicholls, is known locally as Charlotte’s Path.
Bradford Metropolitan District Council’s planning department has flagged the land as being potentially available for new housing as part of the Local Development Framework, but because it is green belt, any such use would only be permitted when all other possible sites had been exhausted. Furthermore, land allocations under the LDF are still far from being finalised.
Concerns have been raised that part of the grazing land at Weaver’s Hill may again be under threat of development. The land, which is part of the green belt, abuts the lane to Oxenhope which, associated with Charlotte Brontë’s meetings with Arthur Bell Nicholls, is known locally as Charlotte’s Path.
Bradford Metropolitan District Council’s planning department has flagged the land as being potentially available for new housing as part of the Local Development Framework, but because it is green belt, any such use would only be permitted when all other possible sites had been exhausted. Furthermore, land allocations under the LDF are still far from being finalised.
Recent newspaper reports suggest that the owner of the
grazing land, whose application for development in 2008 was withdrawn, will
shortly submit a revised application for planning permission for 120
homes. Should this be successful,
he would then launch a second phase of development involving a further 200
houses.
The Brontë Society fully supports Haworth’s prevalent view
that green belt land must remain green.
Large numbers of new houses in this part of the village would have an
extremely detrimental effect on its setting and would bring inappropriate
development disturbingly close to the moorland fringes. The local economy is
founded on heritage tourism.
Anything which may undermine that economy must be examined closely and,
if necessary, strongly rejected.